Alerts

It Is Time for Israel to Start Fighting Like a Startup Nation

Instead of relying on heavy, slow, and anachronistic diplomatic systems, investment should be directed toward identifying and cultivating emerging centers of influence—communities, creators, and influencers.
Share this
binary code graphic
The primary battleground has moved to the realm of perception – “the battle for the algorithm.” (needpix.com)

Table of Contents

Summary

Global influence is increasingly determined by how narratives are framed and amplified through digital platforms rather than by traditional diplomatic channels. The modern information environment rewards speed, emotion, and engagement, making algorithmic visibility a central battleground. To remain competitive, a shift toward innovative, decentralized, and technology-driven strategies is required. Leveraging creative ecosystems and influencer networks can more effectively shape public perception and outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • The main arena of influence has shifted from traditional diplomacy to digital perception shaped by algorithms, social media, and AI.
  • Success now depends on the ability to create engaging, emotionally resonant content that drives visibility and shapes public consciousness.
  • Building networks of influencers, communities, and creators is more effective than relying on slow, institutional diplomatic systems.

The Hebrew version of this article appeared in Israel Hayom on April 27, 2026.

With the announcement of Tzipi Hotovely’s appointment as Minister of Public Diplomacy, it would be appropriate to change the name of the ministry as well. “Public diplomacy” is an anachronistic concept that has lost its relevance in wartime. It seems that Israel is expected to meet moral, legal, and humanistic standards that are not consistently applied to any other country.

This demand is not only unbalanced, but also reflects a deep flaw in the very conception of European humanism. Europe, which sees itself as a leader of Enlightenment values, has not truly completed a genuine intellectual revolution; instead, it has replaced the religious dogmatism of the Middle Ages with a new form of dogmatism and persistent subjectivity, in which truth is no longer a matter of facts but of interpretation and consciousness.

“Truth for its time,” a novel term coined by the Israeli Supreme Court, which has warmly adopted progressive European approaches, has long since taken a place of honor at the forefront of respected axioms and paradigms.

From this fluid notion of “truth,” quite a few disasters have emerged throughout European history, and Jews have repeatedly been among the first victims. Therefore, when contemporary international discourse focuses on Israel, employing at times hollow moral jargon and aggressive rhetorical framing, it should be seen not only as potentially legitimate criticism, but also as a continuation of a deeper historical pattern.

The Battlefield Has Shifted to the Algorithm

In this context, it is clear that Israel can no longer rely on outdated “public diplomacy” paradigms or an apologetic approach. In the age of artificial intelligence and social media, the primary battleground has moved to the realm of perception, to what can be described as “the battle for the algorithm.” Reality is no longer shaped solely by facts, but by how they are disseminated, framed, and amplified within complex digital systems.

A conceptual shift is therefore required, from traditional diplomacy to a model focused on shaping the cognitive landscape, similar to how global innovation companies construct narratives around their products in saturated markets. Israel, as a startup nation with a distinct advantage in creativity and technology, is well positioned to lead such a move.

It must operate in a sophisticated, multilayered manner, penetrate deeper layers of public opinion, and build organic, bottom-up processes of influence. If Israel continues to engage in the arena of perception using only traditional public diplomacy or conventional diplomatic tools, it will simply lose to those who already understand that this is a competitive, saturated, and multi-channel marketplace. The more accurate analogy is that of a disruptive startup entering a conservative market and challenging its rules from within.

Those Who Create Content Shape Visibility

Israel must shift from a “public diplomacy” mindset to a model of deep alignment between the message and the psychology, habits, and algorithms of its target audiences. The notion of “capturing the algorithm” is not merely technical; it is strategic. Platform algorithms reward emotion, engagement, pace, and virality. Those who understand how to produce content that drives interaction, builds communities, and activates distributed networks of influence effectively determine visibility, set the agenda, and shape public consciousness.

Here lies Israel’s relative advantage: an ecosystem of innovation, expertise in AI and cyber, and a proven ability to break into saturated markets through non-linear thinking. Yet potential advantage is not realized without the allocation of resources, the development of infrastructure, and the recruitment of the right human capital—developers, analysts, creators, and strategists working together as a unified innovation unit. Ultimately, as every entrepreneur knows, it is not the best product that wins, but the one that succeeds in penetrating the market, shaping demand, and controlling the narrative around it.

Instead of relying on heavy, slow, and anachronistic diplomatic systems, investment should be directed toward identifying and cultivating emerging centers of influence—communities, creators, and influencers. In a world where a single influencer with a million followers may shape public perception more than a thousand ambassadors, power has shifted from institutions to the dynamic networks of collective consciousness.

This is a long, complex, and resource-intensive process, yet one that aligns with the spirit of the times and Israel’s relative strengths. “Those who do not control the narrative are controlled by it; and those who lose the battle for perception ultimately lose the battle for reality.”

FAQ
Why is traditional diplomacy considered less effective today?
Because it is slow and less adaptable to the fast-paced, multi-channel digital environment where public perception is shaped in real time.
What does “battle for the algorithm” mean?
It refers to competing for visibility and influence on digital platforms where algorithms determine which narratives gain traction and reach audiences.
What strategy is suggested for greater influence?
Focusing on creating impactful content and investing in networks of influencers and communities to organically shape narratives and public opinion.

Oded Ailam

Oded Ailam is a former head of the Counterterrorism Division in the Mossad and is currently a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA).
Share this

Invest in JCFA

Subscribe to Daily Alert

The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.

Related Items

Stay Informed, Always

Get the latest news, insights, and updates directly in your inbox—be the first to know!

Subscribe to Jerusalem Issue Briefs
The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.